STAY OLD

WhoAmI
Nov 29, 2020
3 min read

Nature has a dogma that states "power dominates powerless"

If that's the case

1. why humans can't accept this dogma

2. How the use of lifeless things changed lives?

To drive deep into the above questions first we should know do all other species follow the supreme dogma?

Yes, it does follow

Let us start by taking the earth

Earth is nature's planet and

Nature is made up of only two things

1. Life and

2. Lifeless, that helps to support life

As of beginning, every life directly depended on other life for food and still, that holds with animals

Animals took power as a bottom line to run their life cycle and they created a hierarchy based on the strength they possess

Ex. When deer is hungry it just eats plants

When a tiger is hungry it just hunts and eats deer

The male lion proves dominance in the pride with blood

this shows that their strength in the battle of survival, fetch the sheer answer to what they want from the battle

So this example clarifies that species other than humans follow the dogmatic principle of power

But for humans, as we get an exception in everything and as an evolutionary species, we handled this dogmatic principle differently.

what we did is we tried to utilize both the intelligence and the earth to it's fullest potential to battle and better the survival.

after carving for ages agriculture gave us the solution to battle and to better our survival

once we realized that we flourished with the food, the greed of our intelligence for better survival started to gain pace so we inclined towards these lifeless things to enhance comfortness.

So we dropped off the direct dependency with other life and instead, we added lifeless things as an integral part of our life to make a safe and seamless living

So we begin to introduce a channel between two lives through the vast lifeless medium

ADVANTAGE : BLOODLESS BATTLE

comfortability is luxuries,

luxuries are resources,

resources are minimum and

minimum increases competition

history showcases to us that when the space of comfortability begins to expand, the number of people's interactions and engagement towards the luxuries started to rose drastically that inturn triggered each individual to utilize a maximum of the available resources.

this is unhealthy when the place gets overpopulated and the earth is overpopulated

because if everybody gets access to what they desire then the desire losses its value. Right?

So people understood it and came up with things that can make the acquisition difficult.

This laid the path to current bloodless battles.

Competition, exams, sports

in this contemporary world, These have become a filtering mechanism to filter the best.

DISADVANTAGE : WHY LIFE IS HARD ?

In the forest, the deer and the tiger just takes what it wants and it doesn't need permission to enjoy its need

But for us humans it's not the case, as we discussed above we created a channel in-between that restrict us from enjoying our needs and to have comfort, in many cases the tunneling material will be money

MONEY gets everything but

MONEY is hard to get right?

In prehistorical ages, humans were like animals and life was easy but when they tried to add comfortness, life became hard to live.

CONCLUSION

Now we can understand that as human, as we evolve our desires and needs too evolve over time that sounds like different desire, requires different competition and balancing everything in 2 hands is hard, we get jammed and

Many of our desires are just comforts